ISO 7206-12:2016 PDF

Implants for surgery — Partial and total hip joint prostheses — Part 12: Deformation test method for acetabular shells

Open preview (PDF)

Title (English):

ISO 7206-12:2016

Implants for surgery — Partial and total hip joint prostheses — Part 12: Deformation test method for acetabular shells

Document status:: Withdrawn
Format:: Electronic (PDF)
Number of pages:: 8
Publication date:: September 23, 2016
Edition:: ISO IS 7206 edition 1 version 1
ICS:: 11.040.40

Delivery type:

Full version25 €Read online 24h10 €Read online 72h15 €

Document language:

enru

Delivery time:Immediate download

Price:25 €

Description (English):

ISO 7206-12:2016 specifies a test method for determining short-term deformation of a press-fit acetabular component for total hip joint replacement under specific laboratory conditions. It also defines the conditions of testing so that the important parameters that affect the components are taken into account and it describes how the specimen is set up for testing. Furthermore, this part of ISO 7206 specifies the test parameters of press-fit acetabular components tested in accordance with this part of ISO 7206. The described method is intended to be used to evaluate the comparison of various designs and materials used for acetabular components in total hip joint replacement when tested under similar conditions. The loading of the acetabular components in vivo will, in general, differ from the loading defined in this test method. The results obtained here cannot be used to directly predict in vivo performance. ISO 7206-12:2016 does not cover methods of examining the test specimen.

Technical details

Technical committee: ISO/TC 150/SC 4 - Bone and joint replacements
SKU: ISO 7206-12:2016

Abstract

Overview

ISO 7206-12:2016 - Implants for surgery: Partial and total hip joint prostheses - Part 12: Deformation test method for acetabular shells - defines a laboratory test method for determining short‑term deformation of press‑fit acetabular components (acetabular shells) used in total hip replacement. The standard specifies test set‑up, loading conditions and measurement planes so designers, manufacturers and test labs can compare deformation behavior of different acetabular cup designs, materials and modular systems under reproducible conditions. Results are intended for comparative evaluation; they do not directly predict in vivo performance.

Key topics and requirements

Test principle: diametrically opposite two‑point loading with measurements of inner diameter and circularity in a defined measurement plane taken before, during and after loading.
Rotation protocol: deformation measurement repeated for three orientations by rotating the specimen by 120° each time to account for asymmetric features (fins, holes, cut‑outs).
Modular vs monoblock cups: modular metal‑backed systems are tested in two steps - metal backing alone, then with the articulating insert; monoblock cups are tested in one step.
Apparatus and dimensions: load frame must allow reproducible axial loading along a defined axis and accommodate cups up to 100 mm diameter and 50 mm height. Clamping jaws require flat contact surfaces and a clamping width ≥ 20% of the outer diameter. Load cell uncertainty requirement: 1%.
Measurement plane: defined parallel and close to the frontal face reference plane to maximize sensitivity; measurement points must not be obstructed by design features.
Specimen selection: worst‑case size representative of production should be used; for modular systems identify worst‑case backing and insert combinations.
Scope limits: covers short‑term laboratory deformation only; does not prescribe acceptance deformation limits nor specimen examination methods.

Applications and users

Who benefits:

Orthopaedic implant manufacturers - evaluate how cup geometry, wall thickness, materials and anti‑rotation features influence deformation during press‑fit fixation.
R&D and design engineers - compare alternative designs and optimize cup stiffness, insert seating and tribology implications.
Independent testing laboratories and conformity assessment bodies - provide standardized deformation data for technical files and product comparisons.
Regulatory and clinical engineers - use comparative laboratory data to support risk assessments related to seating, locking mechanisms and potential wear influences.

Practical value:

Facilitates objective comparison of acetabular shell designs and materials under controlled implant testing conditions and helps identify designs that may compromise insert seating or articulating surface geometry.

Related standards

ISO 7206‑1, ISO 7206‑2 (other parts of the hip prosthesis series)
ISO 21534 (joint replacement implant requirements)
ISO 2768‑2 (geometrical tolerances)

Related standards

Standards mentioned in the description

Abstract

Overview

Key topics and requirements

Test principle: diametrically opposite two‑point loading with measurements of inner diameter and circularity in a defined measurement plane taken before, during and after loading.
Rotation protocol: deformation measurement repeated for three orientations by rotating the specimen by 120° each time to account for asymmetric features (fins, holes, cut‑outs).
Modular vs monoblock cups: modular metal‑backed systems are tested in two steps - metal backing alone, then with the articulating insert; monoblock cups are tested in one step.
Apparatus and dimensions: load frame must allow reproducible axial loading along a defined axis and accommodate cups up to 100 mm diameter and 50 mm height. Clamping jaws require flat contact surfaces and a clamping width ≥ 20% of the outer diameter. Load cell uncertainty requirement: 1%.
Measurement plane: defined parallel and close to the frontal face reference plane to maximize sensitivity; measurement points must not be obstructed by design features.
Specimen selection: worst‑case size representative of production should be used; for modular systems identify worst‑case backing and insert combinations.
Scope limits: covers short‑term laboratory deformation only; does not prescribe acceptance deformation limits nor specimen examination methods.

Applications and users

Who benefits:

Orthopaedic implant manufacturers - evaluate how cup geometry, wall thickness, materials and anti‑rotation features influence deformation during press‑fit fixation.
R&D and design engineers - compare alternative designs and optimize cup stiffness, insert seating and tribology implications.
Independent testing laboratories and conformity assessment bodies - provide standardized deformation data for technical files and product comparisons.
Regulatory and clinical engineers - use comparative laboratory data to support risk assessments related to seating, locking mechanisms and potential wear influences.

Practical value:

Facilitates objective comparison of acetabular shell designs and materials under controlled implant testing conditions and helps identify designs that may compromise insert seating or articulating surface geometry.

Related standards

ISO 7206‑1, ISO 7206‑2 (other parts of the hip prosthesis series)
ISO 21534 (joint replacement implant requirements)
ISO 2768‑2 (geometrical tolerances)

ISO 7206-12:2016 PDF

Technical details

Abstract

Overview

Key topics and requirements

Applications and users

Related standards

Related standards

Abstract

Overview

Key topics and requirements

Applications and users

Related standards

Related standards

Implants for surgery — Partial and total hip-joint prostheses — Part 10: Determination of resistance to stati…

Implants for surgery — Partial and total hip joint prostheses — Part 2: Articulating surfaces made of metalli…

Non-active surgical implants - Joint replacement implants - Particular requirements (ISO 21534:2007)

General tolerances — Part 2: Geometrical tolerances for features without individual tolerance indications